At the end of the day, I’m not judging people who choose to go to SlutWalk because SlutWalk is not the problem, not really. The problem here, in my opinion, is a lack of motivation and encouragement to engage in activism that isn’t fun. I beg all SlutWalkers to consider putting their enthusiasm to use fighting sexual assault in other ways as well. I suspect quite a few already do, but it still needs to be said. Being a rape crisis advocate or calling friends out on dangerous thought patterns is not nearly as fun as attending something like SlutWalk. Instead of being surrounded be a crowd of cheering happy comrades you might often find yourself alone and struggling, looking like the odd one out instead of an awesome member of a popular movement… but these are the actions that make the biggest impact, because they are the ones that invade everyday culture, they are the ones that ensure someone is there to help sexual assault survivors in their times of need.
-Volunteering for your local Rape Crisis Center. If you don’t feel capable of taking hotline calls or going on accompaniments (which does take a lot out of you) you can often still offer your time staffing information tables at events, doing office work, and so on.
-If you’re a nurse consider becoming a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (the people who collect evidence from survivors of sexual assault) and helping sexual assault survivors directly by servicing them during some of the toughest parts of their ordeal.
-Get involved with the Green Dot Project. There are a ton of ways to do this… everything from hosting Green Dot events in your area to becoming certified as a Green Dot VIP to simply doing your best to act out green dots (like calling people out on rape jokes or calling the police when witnessing violence) in your daily life.
-Learn about consent laws and the basics of affirmative consent. Then, educate your friends and family so that everyone can have consensual sex!
-Attend a Take Back the Night event – where survivors share their stories and attendees take to the streets to reclaim the night (traditionally a time where people warn women not to be out alone lest they be raped) from fear of sexual assault.
The sections are taken out of order. I didn’t just link the article because I’ve already posted a lot of stuff about issues with SlutWalk, and I just want to focus on the other things one can do to help out. Activism is hard. (I just got back from a month internship at the organization previously known as ACORN, New England United for Justice, in Boston.)
(via feministthought) activism isn’t always fun, I think it’s important to realize that slutwalks are useful and bring alot of attention to an important issue, but sometimes you gotta get dirty and put your activism to work by using it in a way that may seem mundane. (via brazenbitch)
RECENTLY my mother asked me to clarify what I meant when I said I was dating someone, versus when I was hooking up with someone, versus when I was seeing someone. And I had trouble answering her because the many options overlap and blur in my mind. But at one point, four years ago, I had a boyfriend. And I know he was my boyfriend because he said, “I want you to be my girlfriend,” and I said, “O.K.”
He and I dated for over a year, and when we broke up I thought my angsty heart was going to spit itself right up out of my sore throat. Afterward, I moved out of my mother’s house in Brooklyn and into an apartment in the East Village, and from there it becomes confusing.
So, a few days after the chat with my mom, when I found myself downtown drinking tea with my friend Steven, I asked him what he thought about dating. He has a long-term girlfriend, and I was curious how he viewed their relationship.
“The main thing,” he said, “is I don’t mind if she sleeps with other people. I mean, she’s not my property, right? I’m just glad I get to hang out with her. Spend time with her. Because that’s all we really have, you know? I don’t want her to be mine, and I don’t want to be anybody’s.”
I sucked my teeth and looked over at the next table, where two men sat opposite each other. One looked over his shoulder and gave me a closed-mouth grin.
Steven explained that it’s not a question of faithfulness but of expectation. He can’t be expected not to want to sleep with other people, so he can’t expect her to think differently. They are both young and living in New York, and as everyone in New York knows, there’s the possibility of meeting anyone, everywhere, all the time.
For the sake of brevity and clarity, I’ll say I’ve dated a lot of guys. It’s not that I’ve gone out anywhere with a lot of these guys, or been physical with most of them, or even seen them more than once. But there have been many, many encounters.
I’ve met guys in the park, at the deli, at galleries, at parties and on the Internet. The Internet idea came from thinking that if I could sift through people’s profiles, like applications, I could eliminate the obvious lunatics.
And that didn’t work out very well. One leaned across the table an hour into dinner and screamed: “You love me! I know you do!” Another stood outside my apartment with one finger on the buzzer and another covering the peephole, occasionally banging his fist, until he finally exhausted himself and left.
As for the guys I first met in person, there was the construction worker I ran into on the train twice before saying anything, kissed the third time, kissed the fourth time, got stood up by the fifth time and never saw again. Then there was the guy with tattooed knuckles, the young Republican, the Irishman on vacation and the guy who stole $300 from me to buy drugs. There was the activist, the actor, the librarian, the waiter and the bond trader.
So when my friends and I started having a conversation about the nature of monogamy, I thought I knew something about monogamy. Because, despite the fleeting nature of most of my encounters, and despite my own role in their short duration, I think what I have been seeking in some form from all of these men is permanence.
Sometimes I don’t like them, or am scared of them, and a lot of times I’m just bored by them. But my fear or dislike or boredom never seems to diminish my underlying desire for a guy to stay, or at least to say he is going to stay, for a very long time.
And even when I don’t want him to stay — even when he and I find each other as strangers and remain strangers until we stop doing whatever it is we are doing — I still want to believe that two people can meet and like each other well enough to stay together exclusively, without the introduction of some 1960s rhetoric about free love or other noncommittal slogans.
But noncommittal is what we’re all about.
There was the guy with red hair and big steaklike hands that walked with me arm in arm through Washington Square Park, kissed me on the stoop of my mother’s brownstone and said he wanted to be my boyfriend. Until our next walk, when he kept his hands to himself and said he meant boyfriend “in the theoretical sense of the word.”
Then there was the installer of soy insulation who cooked soggy pasta and made me watch football and whimpered and kicked in his sleep. In the spring there was the guy 12 years older than me who shared an apartment overlooking Tompkins Square Park with an antediluvian man who walked around in graying long underwear.
There was the guy who wore more makeup than I did, and the one who waxed his eyebrows clean off his face. And the one who slept with a guy when he was drunk, then with another when he was sober. (But he insisted he wasn’t gay, just curious, and since when was I so uptight anyway?)
Over the summer there was the Jesuit taking a break from the seminary who stopped calling after I said I wouldn’t sleep with him on our third date. In the fall, back at school, there was the banjo player from the woods of New England who took me home to meet his family, then moved away and told me to wait for him. And I did, for months, until he called to say he was falling in love with me, and oh, man, I had to come see him right away (“Buy your ticket tonight!”), before he called again to say it was moving too fast and he wasn’t ready.
And on, and on, and on.
Then this winter I met a guy while waiting to have my computer fixed. He had big blue eyes and a wide red mouth and delicate hands and greasy brown hair. He sat down and asked what I was reading and did I have a boyfriend because he was asking me out. He smelled like incense and clean linen, and I was overwhelmingly and instantaneously smitten. Among other things, I liked his indifference, confidence and knowledge of foreign film directors.
On our first date he explained his theory of exclusive relationships, which was that they shouldn’t exist. We talked about our (and all of our friends’) divorced parents, about how marriage was nothing but a pragmatic financial venture, and about the last time we cheated on someone. He said that his disregard for monogamy wasn’t a chauvinistic throwback, but quite the opposite: the ultimate nod to feminism.
On our second date we watched coverage of the Iowa caucus, and later, after listening to jazz at his apartment, he crawled onto his bed, leaned against the headboard and said he didn’t burn artificial light after dark. I sighed and edged into bed next to him.
During the night he kicked and snored, grabbing greedily at me with his well-moisturized hands like a child snatching at free candy.
We overslept. In the morning I watched him dress frantically, the way a drifter would (gray pants and shirt tucked in and tie and vest and brown wingtip shoes and gray sweater and red scarf and jacket: it was lovely). He looked up occasionally from his scrambling to give a big toothy smile. I made the bed and drank the orange juice he bought for me the night before. We left his apartment and tried to find a cab.
As we crossed Hudson Street, we waded through a passing stream of preschool children walking in pairs, holding hands. I watched their teachers — one at the front of the line, one in the middle, one at the back — while he hailed a taxi.
A week passed before I saw him again. I was about to go back to school in Vermont, and he was headed to Jamaica on vacation. When I entered the restaurant, he said: “The nice part about having a shoddy memory is I forget how pretty some people are. You look beautiful.”
As we ate, we theorized about the effects of pornography on romantic relationships. Dinner ended; he had to go pack for his trip. I asked casually when I was going to see him again.
He sighed. “That’s a loaded question.”
I asked what he meant, because I thought the question was fairly straightforward.
Then it came. The story. The long, boring, aggravatingly rehearsed and condescending story. It spewed, overflowed and dripped off our table and onto the floor and underneath the shoes of the other patrons and into the street.
He said he had just gotten out of a long relationship, and now he was single and didn’t really know how this whole dating thing works, but he was seeing a lot of other people, and he liked me; he thought I was special. Cross my heart, he actually called me special.
WHEN he was done, he asked: “That’s what you were talking about, right? Seeing me again and the nature of our relationship? Like, what are we to each other?”
I said I just meant to ask when we were going to see each other again, because I thought that was the polite thing to do after a few dates, and I wondered if he wanted to make time for me to come back to New York to see him. And he said no, that was “too much, too soon,” but if I’m ever in town I should call him. He would love to see me.
We left. It was raining, he hailed a cab for me, and we hugged without looking at each other. I got into the cab and rode away.
And tried to process it. And tried to remind myself that when we first met I thought he was an arrogant, presumptuous little man. I tried to think about my conversation with Steven. I tried to remember that I was actively seeking to practice some Zenlike form of nonattachment. I tried to remember that no one is my property and neither am I theirs, and so I should just enjoy the time we spend together, because in the end it’s our collected experiences that add up to a rich and fulfilling life. I tried to tell myself that I’m young, that this is the time to be casual, careless, lighthearted and fun; don’t ruin it.
The ruling elite has created social institutions that have subdued young Americans and broken their spirit of resistance
Psychopathologizing and Medicating Noncompliance
Schools That Educate for Compliance and Not for Democracy.
“No Child Left Behind” and “Race to the Top.”
Shaming Young People Who Take Education—But Not Their Schooling—Seriously
The Normalization of Surveillance.
Fundamentalist Religion and Fundamentalist Consumerism
I personally believe the youth of today is too dumb to realize that they’re getting fucked and the smart few that do either don’t care or believe one day soon they’ll be doing the fucking, so why fight it
Wow way to generalize there buddy. That kind of bullshit ageism is the 9th reason actually.
And then the 10th reason is their inherently ableist assumption of intelligence.
“But it is the female commentators who make me want to spit nails. Mary Carillo and occasional commentator and tennis legend Chris Evert are the worst of them all. Mary Carillo vacillates between loving Serena—now, anyway—and criticizing her. In the early part of their careers, the sisters winning game was attributed to their powerful bodies. But they were frequently accused of “lacking strategy,” “not thinking about their shots,” and “relying on their ‘natural athleticism.” Whey they started coming to the net and winning, their success was attributed yet again to their “natural athletic ability.” The Williams Sisters were represented as hypermasculine, unattractive women overpowering dainty white female tennis players (although Jennifer Capriati, Svetlana Kuznetsova, Kim Clijsters and Justine Henin are anything but dainty.) These narratives about Black bodies as “naturally athletic,” “more powerful,” “more wild,” “less thoughtful,” and “less strategic” and black female bodies as “(un)naturally strong, invulnerable, and unattractive”– are central to Western narratives of white racial superiority.”—
A great article that sheds light on how the institution of pro-sports (in this case, pro-tennis) reflects the racist, sexist views of society. Gender and race are extremely important things to take note of when it comes to sports.
What really strikes a cord with me with this article is not only that whenever people of color do exceptionally well in sports, its almost always written off as some magical, voo-doo natual athleticism - as oppose to strategy or anything above mere “primitive, raw strength.” [and can we just let it be known that there is no scientific proof that I hear that attributes race to sheer athletic ability. No, black people don’t have extra bones or muscles…]
But in addition, lets look at how black women are demeaned in these areas. Hypermasculine & unattractive? Because we don’t fall in line with white perceptions of femininity that demand dainty-ness and fragility? Black women just don’t even have a right to femininity - lets just liken the Williams sisters to angry black men and call it a day.